tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1294928770519722820.post7690841570379084843..comments2024-03-08T14:35:24.649+00:00Comments on The Justice of the Peace Blog: HOW EXCEPTIONAL MUST EXCEPTIONAL BE?The Justice of the Peacehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05795957459681808206noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1294928770519722820.post-47923633000028654532014-07-01T09:00:39.688+01:002014-07-01T09:00:39.688+01:00Yes, on the basis of the reported facts and assumi...Yes, on the basis of the reported facts and assuming they are reported accurately, then I would have imposed a ban. I do not consider any of the reported facts to constitute exceptional hardship. <br /><br />This motorists was well aware of his precarious position viz his point situation yet still drove at excess speed. He was aware or at least should have been of the consequences of his action. The fact that the majority of his points were amassed whilst he was an HGV driver is irrelevant to the case in hand. Notwithstanding I would point out that driving an HGV at excess speed demonstrates a highly irresponsible attitude towards road safety and has so often resulted in massive motorway pile ups the consequence of which may result in serious injury or death.<br /><br />This man knew he had to hold a licence for his job and how many millions of other people can also claim that they will lose their house if they lose their job? It is a common enough scenario. Of course his ban would impact on others but that is usually the case. The question is whether the hardship is exceptional. On the basis of the reported facts I don't think it is.<br /><br />On a slightly different note.<br />The guidelines are not about 'Uniformity' they are about consistency. There is a difference. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com