Comments are usually moderated. However, I do not accept any legal responsibility for the content of any comment. If any comment seems submitted just to advertise a website it will not be published.
Tuesday, 29 August 2023
THE FAILURE OF SUPERVISORY BODIES BODES ILL FOR ALL
Earlier this month Mike Dean a hitherto respected and highly experienced football referee now retired acknowledged that he intentionally overlooked an incident and neglected to use the VAR technology to protect his "mate"during a match between Chelsea and Tottenham Hotspur last season. The new technology was introduced to provide fans and the players with as much information as possible in cases where line of sight decisions proved to be difficult for the on field officials. A decision visible to all spectators live and on TV to overrule the VAR was disgraceful and has brought the whole system into disrepute notwithstanding the financial implications for the clubs involved. The referees` supervisory body will be unlikely to take cognisance of his opinions ever again and fans will have further cause for disgruntlement when a debateable decision goes against their team.
Football is a game and big business but murder is murder and one of the most distressing facts to emerge from the Letby case is the failure of several supervisory bodies and individuals to take action when eminent qualified personnel presented prima facia evidence of malpractice by Letby. But this failure was not an isolated misfortune within the NHS. Between 2005 and 2008 at Stafford Hospital the regulator condemned "appalling" standards of care and reported there had been at least 400 more deaths than expected between 2005 and 2008. It listed a catalogue of failings, including receptionists assessing patients arriving at A&E, a shortage of nurses and senior doctors, and pressure on staff to meet targets. The Alder Hey organs scandal involved the unauthorised removal, retention, and disposal of human tissue, including children’s organs, during the period 1986 to 1996. During this period organs were retained in more than 2,000 pots containing body parts from around 850 infants. These were later uncovered at Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool, during a public inquiry into the organ retention scandal. In the 1990s at the Bristol Royal Infirmary, babies died at high rates after cardiac surgery. An inquiry found "staff shortages, a lack of leadership, a unit 'simply not up to the task ... an old boy's culture' among doctors, a lax approach to safety, secrecy about doctors' performance and a lack of monitoring by management". The scandal resulted in cardiac surgeons leading efforts to publish more data on the performance of doctors and hospitals. One could say that the cover up of scandal is endemic within the NHS.
Between 1970 and the early 1990s, an estimated 26,800 people in the UK were given contaminated blood transfusions and blood products infected with hepatitis C or HIV. People with haemophilia, a condition that affects the blood's ability to clot, were particularly affected. The then government and those following knew of contaminated plasma long before it admitted it. A minister privately expressed concerns that Aids was being transmitted by contaminated blood products while the government publicly insisted there was no “conclusive evidence”, newly uncovered documents from 1983 show. Once again the cover up is equal to or more sinister than the original disaster.
Perhaps the scandal involving the Post Office is the most revealing of all. Over many years the Post Office, aided by its lawyers, engaged in what looks like a cover-up due to repeatedly failing to disclose what they knew about problems with Horizon across a number of court cases. Hundreds of innocent people lost their livelihoods, their homes and some were imprisoned as a result. Some committed suicide. In April 2021 39 former subpostmasters had their convictions quashed at the Court of Appeal. The court concluded that the Post Office should not have prosecuted them in the first place and found the Post Office’s conduct “an affront to the conscience of the court”. Such comments by the Court of Appeal are damning and rare. The Court of Appeal’s judgment in 2021 built on findings in a High Court case in 2019 where the failings of Horizon were exposed. The judge in that case also found the defence by the Post Office to be aggressive, excessive, misleading, and otherwise unsatisfactory. It included an application to unseat the presiding judge whom the Post Office considered was biased. Even in those High Court proceedings, the Post Office failed to disclose critical information about the problems with Horizon.
In all those matters those charged with the supervision of systems and personnel not only failed in their task but were active in the suppression of evidence which was contradictory to their interpretation of the investigation. And so to the magistracy with its internal supervisory system no different in its structure from those in medicine or football. Secrecy surrounds most complaints both from without the system and within. Individual complaints by magistrates are met with obstruction and obfuscation whatever the rights or rarely the wrongs of the matter. Advisory committees, if matters progress that far, are generally obstructive. Delay in investigation is the norm. Threats are commonplace. Investigations which reach the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office are just the tip of the iceberg. But what is common in all the above instances is the failure of supervision in one form or another. My point today is that the real failure is of those who appoint the supervisors. It has been estimated by those more knowledgeable than I that there are about 10,000 individuals who are this country`s decision makers. They are colloquially known as "the great and the good". A definition might be "worthy, distinguished or important people especially when gathered together." These are the members of interviewing panels for the likes of the General Medical Council and/or its disciplinary committee. These are the people who appoint government commission members. These are the people who appoint members of investigatory committees. These are the people who are responsible for the repeated instances of supervisory failings in so many areas of our lives.
There is no civic duty more important that being a member of a crown court jury. Life and death, innocence or guilt is in the hands of ordinary people with few caveats. 18 is the minimum age; being a British citizen is not a requirement, lack of fluency in the English language is not a bar and even a person with a serious criminal record can be a jury member. It is my opinion that a cadre of ordinary citizens be assembled from which cohorts should be entrusted with the choosing of professional supervisors in various trade and professional areas. Ordinary citizens with ordinary lives, interests and hopes for the future able to sift the often uniform education, backgrounds and aspirations of wannabe supervisors. Certainly the iniquitous results from current practice are now way beyond mere chance. They are a direct result of current system failure. When the cry in so many areas is more "diversity, diversity, divercity" where is it when actually needed? It`s not for more brown, black, tall short, trans this or trans that people. It is to salvage the confidence of British people in their form of government and its tentacles which reach right down to the nitty gritty of all our lives. The pitifully repeated excuses of who? what? where? when? should no longer be even remotely acceptable. Failure to do so will be a catastrophe: it bodes ill for all of us.
Tuesday, 22 August 2023
CURRENT CRIMINAL EVENTS AND INITIATIVES
f ever the term "scourge" were used as a noun subsequent to its use to describe the Black Death or the Great Plague the calamitous addiction of so many in Scotland to narcotic substances would be a good place to start. It is a sad fact that Scotland has the highest number of per capita drug deaths in Europe. The latest figures show that drug deaths in Scotland fell to 1,051 last year from 1,330 the year before. However, this small reduction in deaths contrasts against fewer than 300 deaths total in 1996. It is fair to conclude that this awful statistic is the Scottish government`s biggest failure by design, incompetence or ignorance since its inception. Having belatedly accepted the situation there might be just the tiniest chink of intellectual light at the end of this abysmal social tunnel.
Decriminalisation is one of those words which brings out the best or the worst in many seasoned observers of drug addiction. For my part I have long been in favour of such a radical change in how society treats a problem which in addition to the misery inflicted on those involved and their families costs the UK £20 billion a year. Latest government information for England and Wales is available here. Drug misuse is estimated to have a total economic and social cost to Scotland alone of £3.5 billion a year. There are the very loud mouthed Cassandras who refuse to think of this catastrophe without looking through the prism of their fixed and stubborn right wing views which colour their thinking on most political endeavours whether drug addiction, immigration or other headline issues. I am anything but a supporter of Scottish independence in general or the SNP in particular but in this instance I wish the Scottish government nothing but goodwill for grasping this nettle.
There can be few in this country who have not reacted with horror at the conclusion of the Letby baby killer trial. That this monster refused to attend court for sentencing is the latest manifestation of arrogance exhibited by some of the most heinous criminals of this century. But for leading politicians to state publicly that Letby should have been dragged if necessary kicking and screaming into the dock to face the sentencing judge is populism at its lowest level. For those not faced with a whole of life sentence there is certainly an argument that such refusal as a contempt of court would invite an increased sentence but I doubt that in the few cases which would be likely to occur, additional time, e.g. an added year, would be no deterrent to those whose arrogance and possible psychopathy put them in the dock in the first place.
Tuesday, 15 August 2023
THE MAGISTRACY//IS THERE A FUTURE?
What is a criminal justice system? The collection of agencies including, but not limited to, the police, the courts, the Ministry of Justice and the Home Office which are involved in the detection and prevention of crime, the prosecution of people accused of committing crimes, the conviction and sentencing of those found guilty. What is the purpose of a CJS? According to various sources it is:-
Tuesday, 8 August 2023
MAGISTRATES: ESTABLISHED 1361// BEST BEFORE 2023
I have remarked in the past about the press and PR department at the Ministry of Justice. Its output volume in my opinion varies inversely with the quality of the progress being attempted in resurrecting what was once upon a time more than the fairy tale justice department it now is; when news, information and outcomes were true, sincere and to to be considered a great benefit of a society in which we were lucky to live. Along with many other attributes and qualities of leadership there really was a spark, a light, which allowed Britain to be considered "great". It wasn`t military or empire; it was we the people and our antecedents over the last century who inherited and nourished to the best of each of our abilities a desire to be our best for our families and for each other. It generally included, with some few exceptions, those we elected to power on all the levels from parish to Downing Street. There was corruption and malevolence of course but it was recognised, faced down and life went on but not anymore. The output from government departments was generally informative and consequently trusted by those to whom it was directed: not anymore. In May 2023 a Freedom of Information request was made to the Ministry of Justice (MoJ):
Tuesday, 1 August 2023
SOCIETAL BREAKDOWN//CONSERVATIVE "BLAH" OR OPPOSITION "RHUBARB"
Below is the main headline from today`s Times newspaper.
We are now at the cusp of another football season. And once again today`s Times provides the subject matter.
There is little doubt in my opinion that the referees will follow the hard line of their paymasters. Unlike those above, referees` emoluments and indeed their fitness to officiate will be judged at almost the speed of light by those who pull the financial strings within professional football. Whether or not football clubs` and police efficiency in identifying and prosecuting those supporters for whom the beautiful game is just an opportunity to cause havoc and mayhem will bring law `n order back to the terraces is another matter. The figures below for those hooligans who have been subjected to recent football banning orders do not offer high hopes that such disgusting behaviour will be any less in the forthcoming season as in the past.
It takes more than statistics for historians to decide when a society has broken down. Public disorder and its treatment or curtailment are one disturbing factor but combined with hidden and not so hidden police corruption the signs are there for all to see as is the failure of supervisory bodies in many professions and organisations. But it is for government to act. Over the next eighteen months we will find out if it is Conservative blah or Opposition rhubarb which wins the day.