Had a case earlier this month where the
charge revolved to a great extent around the information held on a mobile
phone. However the local constabulary
and the CPS in their wisdom or lack thereof did not provide such evidence. Once again the hurdle of beyond reasonable
doubt allowed a likely offender to walk.
Once again the Scots verdict of not proven described the situation.
Comments are usually moderated. However, I do not accept any legal responsibility for the content of any comment. If any comment seems submitted just to advertise a website it will not be published.
Wednesday 21 January 2015
Friday 16 January 2015
GRAYLING`S LAW
The latest events in the saga of
Grayling`s Law is reported in the Law Society Gazette. One sure benefit of this forthcoming election
will see the removal of this abomination of a justice secretary from the office
he has forever tarnished.
Wednesday 14 January 2015
WHO NEEDS LEGAL AID?
As I recall, only once have I had a QC in
front of me and that was in connection with a planning matter of some
importance. It is quite a story in
itself when an individual of such exalted status appears before a magistrates`
bench. The fiancée of celebrity Stephen
Fry had the benefit of such high level representation when he appeared before
Cwmbran magistrates recently. There is a report in the Daily Telegraph.
There is as much similarity in the
argument that a “short, sharp custodial sentence” is a waste of time as there
is in the debate as to whether a seven day driving ban is any sort of
punishment or deterrent in a matter of speeding. Unless
a ban is of significant length; ie 28
days minimum, my opinion is and has been
that exceeding 100MPH on a motorway is worthy, all things considered, of there being given serious thought to the
imposition of 6 penalty points as the preferred option. But then what do I know?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)