Comments are usually moderated. However, I do not accept any legal responsibility for the content of any comment. If any comment seems submitted just to advertise a website it will not be published.
Thursday, 6 December 2018
LIFE SHOULD BE LIFE: END OF
When I was twelve years old I wrote an essay the subject of which was "Why I want capital punishment abolished". Eight years later when abolition took place I was aware that all the proponents of that unique change (noting the increasing restrictions on its application) in a centuries old policy were very ready to offer their assurances that new sentencing powers would ensure that the public would be every bit as protected as pre abolition. That was a fatuous guarantee. However I, in harmony with a majority of the population, was prepared to be supportive on the basis of time will tell. Well; time has told. What ever statistics are used and/or manipulated homicides have increased considerably in the last half century. There are occasions when a significant minority of people has a certain repugnance at the conclusions of the Parole Board. The furore surrounding the black cab rapist who was scheduled for release a few months ago persuaded the Parole Board to have a re think. It seems, however, that the great and the good on that Quango have once again given two fingers to public opinion. The release has been authorised of triple child killer David McGreavy after his 45 years incarceration. Their reasoning is that he is no longer a threat to the public. This indeed might be the case but it does not justify IMHO his release. Restricted prison accommodation or cost cannot be used as an excuse in this matter. Consideration for him in any way similarly must be ignored. His crime was of the most heinous nature. There have been few of equal barbarity. His punishment was life imprisonment. If this lowest form of humanity cannot serve out his remaining days under lock and key we, the great British public, will find that our respect for the justice system will be accelerated further towards terminal decline.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Following the points that you have made, there is probably a case for the reinstatement of Capital Punishment, but, in view of some miscarriages of justice that have occurred over the years, the standard of proof must be extremely high. The possibility of a meeting with the hangman might just make some of these ne-er do wells think twice. The moment the trap springs on the first one to be convicted will focus attention even more. And before we start the debate about whether hanging is the best method, I read somewhere that Albert Pierrepoint was sent off to America by the government of the day (I think in the immediate post WW2 years) to see what other methods were in use. His unequivocal view was that hanging was best - very quick and very efficient. He wasn't at all impressed by lethal injection, I recollect, the whole process took far too long.
ReplyDelete