We`ve all read transcripts of 999 calls where the
document has been adduced by the CPS or occasionally counsel for the defence and
generally do not question its accuracy.
I was of that mind until a recent sitting caused an abrupt change of
mind. The document covered a call of
about a minute and was two pages in length.
During the call the complainant never mentioned by name or relationship the person who, she felt, was a
threat to her. He was referred to
throughout as “he”. However just over
half way through the document the police support person taking the call
referred to the third party by name. Now
it might just be my paranoia getting up a head of steam but I found this rather
peculiar. There might have been an
innocent reason for this occurrence but
fortunately there was no need to probe further as we found no case to answer. But the lesson was well learned; in court
there is no embarrassment in being a
pedant....in fact it should be considered a compliment.
Comments are usually moderated. However, I do not accept any legal responsibility for the content of any comment. If any comment seems submitted just to advertise a website it will not be published.
Wednesday 8 October 2014
Monday 6 October 2014
MAGISTRATES MIDDLE CLASS?
Many years ago I questioned why the Magistrates`
Association could not employ a press officer at least on a part time basis such
were its poor PR efforts. As I recall
the answer was that there were more pressing needs for its members` fees. And that was when there were close to 30,000
members. Now there are barely 20,000 and
even with increased membership fees the treasury must be getting rather
bare. The current chairman has been
associated with the upper echelons of the organisation for quite some time and
should hold himself partially responsible for current criticisms. A few days ago he gave an exclusive interview
to The Times behind its paywall. He
describes the MA as having been under attack in recent months. Make that “months” years and the article
would have the beginnings of some accuracy as to his comments and to his
culpability. He bleats on about the same
old topics of his predecessors but what amused me most was his denial that the
magistracy is elderly, middle class and predominantly white. It is elderly because most younger
people of working age or their employers cannot afford an absence from their
jobs of a very minimum of 26 half days annually sitting in court plus at least two full days training when they
are entering or within the most costly period of their lifespans. If
middle class is a description of income
level or occupation it is not unreasonable to consider somebody with the mental
and personality capacities to be a Justice of the Peace to use those faculties
in the employment they undertake. I have
known many people described as working class who could have sat on the bench but were unable to afford the
time and hence the loss of income to do so.
The last criticism which he correctly denied of there
being a “white” magistracy indicates
only too clearly the ignorance of those who make that assumption. Benches truly reflect the ethnic make up of
their regions. But to return to the term “middle class”; Mr
Monkhouse uses his own persona to counter that allegation above mentioned insofar as he is
not middle class because he says “I am a
northerner; I go to football every week.......”
So there you have it from the chairman of the
Magistrates Association. My colleagues south of Watford who spend their
Saturdays not watching football........yep......they`re middle class and conform to the stereotype.
Friday 3 October 2014
THE CONCEPT OF POLICE AND CRIME COMMISSIONER REQUIRES OVERHAUL
When the concept of Police and Crime Commissioners
was mooted I must admit to having a positive outlook. However since then a
combination of events has caused me to
have second thoughts. A recent news
report has more or less convinced me that whilst the idea might have merit its
implementation has not been carefully managed.
The report in the Northern Echo of three regional
PCCs castigating a crown court judge for his sentence in a case of actual
bodily harm in a domestic context shows that those people have not referred to
the limits of their powers. They have
entered an arena which they should have had the good sense to avoid. In addition their referral was directed to a
body that they should have known had no jurisdiction over their so called complaint. The post of Police and Crime Commissioner
requires immediate overhaul.
Thursday 2 October 2014
MISMANAGEMENT OF OUR COURT
There were four trials listed for the sitting. Considering a sitting is three hours the
procedural formalities for each trial even that which seems the simplest on paper can be quite time
consuming. Add to the mix an
unrepresented defendant and/or an interpreter both of which are increasingly
commonplace and the loosest of schedules can be widely missed. That it wasn`t was due entirely to the
ineptitude, inefficiency and mismanagement of the court`s and CPS administrative
staff not excluding those in senior positions who appear to have no idea how to
manage inefficient staff or are precluded from so doing by the machinations of
the civil service and the associated unions.
We were told that the first matter listed had been discontinued
precisely one day previously resulting in the defendant appearing before us at
10.00a.m. with her witness in tow having had no idea of the change. The letter of discontinuance would not necessarily have been posted immediately the decision had been made. Indeed it was news to the court. There was no telephone call, text or e mail to the court or defendant. She
was so relieved to be spared the ordeal of defending herself that she refused
to apply for her travel expenses for her two hundred mile round trip. The second trial listed involved a Slovakian
accused of a minor traffic offence. He had brought one witness. CPS told us there was a single police officer
on their side. The case management form from the first
listing at which our L/A had also been the L/A showed quite clearly that a
Slovak interpreter was to be ordered by the court. No such instruction was carried out by the
court administration staff whose responsibility it was and so the trial was
adjourned despite the bench suggesting that CPS “take a view” insofar as the
offence was non endorsable and a police officer had already wasted almost a
whole morning.
The remaining two
cases were dealt with but we still managed to end the session ten minutes over
time. This is the reality of a typical sitting in an
English court. There are of course the
usual squeals of budgets having been cut by 23% since 2010 and consequent staff
reductions of c 10%. For these reasons
it surely behoves management to utilise staff to maximum effect. Grayling has insisted, at least in the civil
courts, that the courts in his perverse thinking must pay their way like any other business. He seems to overlook the fact that no
business on earth would allow the mismanagement that occurs behind the scenes
of my court or presumably any other.
Tuesday 30 September 2014
MORE NUMBERS
Is knife offending increasing or decreasing? What proportion of such offending relates to
youth? Is the rate of custodial
sentencing for knife offences increasing or not? All these questions and others related are
here for your perusal courtesy of the Ministry of Justice.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)