IRISH LOGIC?

Perhaps things are done differently in Northern Ireland at least according to this short report.  Some years ago I invited my winger to do a spot of quick interpreting for an unrepresented defendant and was roundly criticised afterwards by the L/A.  Perhaps somebody can explain the logic for an absolute discharge to be accompanied by the penalty points.  It`s certainly news to me.

CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND COURTS BILL AND THINGS TO COME

Having left the Bench a short time before I was to be compulsorily removed as being too old, feeble and senile to do the job.........at least according to the Ministry of Justice..........and reading the latest atrocious method the not-so-merry men at the M.O.J. had conjured up for their version of Robin (Grey Thing) Hood who robs from the poor to give to the bankers I wondered whether I could be at peace with myself if I were still to sit in court and required to make the appropriate  pronouncement on the published terms.    My first thoughts of resignation were when the so called victim surcharge was made a requirement.  Obviously I decided against such drastic action but in my pronouncement I substituted the phrase “government imposed surcharge over which we have no control”.  There was the occasional raised eyebrow from the wings and the odd comment from a legal advisor at a post court review but nothing more.   And then came the changes from Michael Gove about the non attendance of children at school becoming almost a crime of strict liability.  Having to find guilty a parent or guardian who had done everything but nail the child`s feet to the floor of the classroom was difficult.  Even a three month conditional discharge and no costs constituted a declarable conviction.  Soon colleagues will be faced with the conditions  of the forthcoming Criminal Justice and Courts Bill.  When c£2billion in unpaid fines and costs is probably never going to be recovered, to impose further financial penalties on a class of people with the least ability to pay is the politics of revenge to put it very mildly.  I do think I would have been pushed over the resignation edge.  But paradoxically if such an action were to be taken by former colleagues and I am almost certain some nearing the end of their tenure will do so it will bring a smirk to the faces of those aforementioned all singing and dancing little men at the M.O.J.   It will be further ammunition in their long term goal to oust Justices of the Peace from our courts and restrict custodial sentencing at least to District Judges(M.C.)  They won`t resign in principle over legislation they find iniquitous; they have their salaries and pensions to consider.  I have endeavoured without success to find out how many if any crown court judges and higher have resigned their position over a matter of principle insofar as disagreeing with the legislation they have to uphold.  The conclusion must be that we are sleepwalking into dangerous constitutional territory.  The non report in today`s media of the trial of “not proven to be a terrorist”  Erol Incedal is but a foretaste of  things surely  to come.   

A CONCEPT LOST WILL NEVER BE REGAINED

Traditionally April 1^st is All Fools Day and judging by what we have heard and seen from the electoral combatants so far perhaps All Fools Month would be a better description for 2015.  One factor that can be  laid before us is the extreme unlikelihood of a certain Chris Grayling being allowed to appear before a television audience to encourage support for the Tories. If he were to do so it would be akin to Rosemary West publicly applying to be a foster mother.  It ain`t going to happen.

I cannot remember a Lord Chancellor/Justice Secretary  who has alienated more groups who operate under his authority. Lawyers of all persuasions including the CPS who of course must remain silent, probation officers, prison officials of all ranks including those charged with inspection, judges, magistrates and of course the very concept of Justice itself.  Even for readers inclined to vote Tory it would be interesting to question your candidate as s/he occupies the doorstep for two minutes as to the legacy of said now former Lord Chancellor. In four short years he has tarnished the concept of British justice. It is hard at this stage to consider how what has been lost will ever be regained.

COMING SOON TO A SITE RIGHT HERE......NEW JUSTICE OF THE PEACE BLOG

Roughly a third of all visitors to this site linger for more than one hour.  I find that very gratifying as I also note that about a half of all visits are by those who are first timers. For those reasons and some more to be explained in due course I will not be posting for perhaps a week or so whilst with my limited techie ability I will,  after about six years,  attempt a re-design of this blog.

LEARN SOMETHING NEW

My very last sitting was on motoring and I learned something new.  Re s.172; most provincial police forces follow up a guilty on that charge with pursuit of the substantive matter which initiated the procedure.  That is excluding the country`s largest police force;  The Metropolitan Police.  Don`t ask me why but the motto is that we learn something new every sitting; even the very last.....ever!