Those associated with the Scottish legal system
have generally been proud of its efficiency and fair treatment of
defendants. Indeed along with education
it was cited often during the referendum campaign as symbolic of the country`s
status as an independent nation within the United Kingdom. With the recent amalgamation of the separate
police forces in Scotland into a unified command; Police Scotland, there has now been
established an expert group to examine the ramifications of abolishing “corroboration”
in the courts. The most widespread example
is that two witnesses not excluding police officers are required to give evidence against a
defendant whereas a single witness is sufficient in the other parts of the
U.K. There are also going to be
questions as to changing the number of jurors and the majority needed to
convict. All these proposals are,
according to the arguments, to safeguard
the innocent until proved guilty concept of our justice system. It seems strange therefore if the Herald report is comprehensive that that most
unusual of all processes in Scots law, the verdict of “not proven” , is not up for consideration. On the surface that verdict alone seems
calculated to ensure that any shadow of doubt in the prosecution case is firmly placed in favour of the defendant.
Comments are usually moderated. However, I do not accept any legal responsibility for the content of any comment. If any comment seems submitted just to advertise a website it will not be published.
Wednesday 15 October 2014
Monday 13 October 2014
JEREMIAH J.P.
Once again the best brains at HMCTS seem to be
trying to stand up straight with their knickers rather twisted. One would have thought that after the debacle
of the contract for interpreters which revealed unbelievable inefficiency and
arrogance in that organisation more mundane matters such as managing rotas would
be handled with at least an impression of best practice. It can arguably be the case that correct
management of a rota system for the effective functioning of the country`s
magistrates` courts is a prime if not the prime objective of a
system which has this year been forced
from being a local function to a
national one on the civil service reasoning that bigger is always better.
Our bench prior to 2012 had about 260 members and
after amalgamation with a further two local benches that increased by about 100
or so. During that earlier time period
one rather overworked but extremely efficient person did her very level best to
ensure there were three person benches for every court having used a simple computer
based system every six months to produce a rota for that purpose. When faced with short handed
benches she knew who to contact for short notice additional last minute
sittings; namely those who had indicated their general availability on the rota
request form. Late in 2012 she left work
for personal reasons and was replaced by
two novices who were instructed to immediately institute an annual rota and to
offer the whole new bench the opportunity to fill last minute requirements. The result was obvious to anybody with an
ounce of common sense. Offers to fill
last minute vacancies were left unconfirmed until just a few days prior to
required dates resulting in an enormous increase in two person benches and a
reduced offering from those whose diaries
demanded a more efficient service. Whilst
the novices are now experienced in their task it is only this year end with our
yet to be published rota that it will be for a six month period only as it was
previously. This should assist members
in forecasting more accurately their anticipated availability. But we are still suffering from last minute
court cancellations and paradoxically last minute pleas for assistance in
constituting benches of three even although our enlarged bench now has the same
number of J.P.s as our original bench of 2011.
The eagerly awaited rota for January- June 2015 will, we have been
informed, be full of the latest bells and whistles. It will comprise, in addition to regular allocated sittings, mentored sittings, appraised sittings, crown
court sittings besides the expected mix of sex and ethnic diversity. However if increasing numbers of colleagues
continue to offer only the minimum number of sittings or not many more I cannot
foresee that 2015 will be much different
from 2014 in numbers of cancelled courts, cancelled sittings, two person
benches and last minute requests to make up properly constituted benches.
Just call me J.J.P..............Jeremiah the
Justice of the Peace.
Thursday 9 October 2014
OUR NON SENSE OF SMELL
There occasionally are incidents or alterations of
national procedures which whilst perhaps
insignificant in themselves are indicative of profound changes in what could
arguably be termed “our culture” defined as the ideas, customs, and
social behaviour of a particular people or society. In my lifetime I would suggest that some
examples of our culture were free university education, blue hardcover
passports and the discretion allowed to eg teachers or police officers to make
on the spot decisions without recourse to a higher authority because those
professionals had earned social and professional respect. At “street level” the advice of most parents to their children
if they found something of value on the
road was to hand it in at a police station. It was a given; a no brainer: a classic example of the
difference between a child well brought up and one with no moral
parameters. That simple concept more in
keeping with theory than practice served me and my contemporaries well. Only once did it actually happen to me and I recollect as a child taking what seemed a
very large pound note to the local police station where it probably ended up in
the sergeant`s back pocket. That could
not happen today. Many police stations
are refusing to accept lost property placing the onus on the finder to seek out
the loser.
Readers might consider this change in
procedure trivial and it is. But it is symptomatic of what changes in law,
policing, individual freedoms and justice are happening right under our
noses. Because individually these changes might emit little odour, collectively our noses should be overwhelmed by the smell. They aren`t; and to our detriment as a society our
collective culture has passed the point of no return. Where in most matters British was a term of
pride it is now just the description of an island off the north west coast of Europe.
Wednesday 8 October 2014
PEDANTS RULE: O.K.
We`ve all read transcripts of 999 calls where the
document has been adduced by the CPS or occasionally counsel for the defence and
generally do not question its accuracy.
I was of that mind until a recent sitting caused an abrupt change of
mind. The document covered a call of
about a minute and was two pages in length.
During the call the complainant never mentioned by name or relationship the person who, she felt, was a
threat to her. He was referred to
throughout as “he”. However just over
half way through the document the police support person taking the call
referred to the third party by name. Now
it might just be my paranoia getting up a head of steam but I found this rather
peculiar. There might have been an
innocent reason for this occurrence but
fortunately there was no need to probe further as we found no case to answer. But the lesson was well learned; in court
there is no embarrassment in being a
pedant....in fact it should be considered a compliment.
Monday 6 October 2014
MAGISTRATES MIDDLE CLASS?
Many years ago I questioned why the Magistrates`
Association could not employ a press officer at least on a part time basis such
were its poor PR efforts. As I recall
the answer was that there were more pressing needs for its members` fees. And that was when there were close to 30,000
members. Now there are barely 20,000 and
even with increased membership fees the treasury must be getting rather
bare. The current chairman has been
associated with the upper echelons of the organisation for quite some time and
should hold himself partially responsible for current criticisms. A few days ago he gave an exclusive interview
to The Times behind its paywall. He
describes the MA as having been under attack in recent months. Make that “months” years and the article
would have the beginnings of some accuracy as to his comments and to his
culpability. He bleats on about the same
old topics of his predecessors but what amused me most was his denial that the
magistracy is elderly, middle class and predominantly white. It is elderly because most younger
people of working age or their employers cannot afford an absence from their
jobs of a very minimum of 26 half days annually sitting in court plus at least two full days training when they
are entering or within the most costly period of their lifespans. If
middle class is a description of income
level or occupation it is not unreasonable to consider somebody with the mental
and personality capacities to be a Justice of the Peace to use those faculties
in the employment they undertake. I have
known many people described as working class who could have sat on the bench but were unable to afford the
time and hence the loss of income to do so.
The last criticism which he correctly denied of there
being a “white” magistracy indicates
only too clearly the ignorance of those who make that assumption. Benches truly reflect the ethnic make up of
their regions. But to return to the term “middle class”; Mr
Monkhouse uses his own persona to counter that allegation above mentioned insofar as he is
not middle class because he says “I am a
northerner; I go to football every week.......”
So there you have it from the chairman of the
Magistrates Association. My colleagues south of Watford who spend their
Saturdays not watching football........yep......they`re middle class and conform to the stereotype.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)