Got
to grips for the first time with the new format for search warrants. If truth be told it seems a waste of
time. According to L/A the changes arise
from the non compliance of various parties with the previous rules for
same. So, I ask myself, why not insist
that all parties; courts, J.P.s and
police follow the previous rules to the letter.
Perhaps that is too simplistic so we spent an unnecessary amount of time
combing through the minutiae of the language used.
We
were required to re-open a s.172 matter
where the defendant had not had his not guilty by post presented at the last
occasion. As a result he had been found guilty in absence. On
this occasion we discovered that the service from court to the defendant included words to the effect that his presence
in court was not required! So
once again the matter was adjourned. We
were told later that there are hundreds of examples of such incompetence piling
up owing in the main to there being so few administrative staff after many
redundancies and many of those that remain being unfit for the posts they
hold.
The blame of
course rests with the Justices Clerks and Chris Grayling. But I
would imagine that they are pre occupied contemplating their clamber up the ladder
of civil service and political favour and promotion to be bothered about such
minor details.
No comments:
Post a Comment