It might be boring but it`s worth repeating; alcohol and/or
drug dependence is responsible for around 70% of all crime in this
country. It`s also worth repeating that removing
such people from the criminal justice system into a health care programme even
without compulsion is sometimes frustratingly difficult. Having regards to all that every day in every
court in England a bench of magistrates has to decide on the appropriate
disposal for one or more of those dregs of society. Earlier this week it was my turn. Martin was 45 going on 60. He had four pages of previous and many short
jail terms for prolific minor offending.
His current address was a hostel in another town nearby. He was before us for sentencing on assault,
s.5 public order and criminal damage committed around a single incident. His pre sentence report ran to eight pages
and noted inter alia that for whatever reason his alcohol habit had never been
specifically addressed by the courts. We
were told that he was awaiting his first payment from the benefits office,
previous having stopped when he was homeless and or inside. We decided that in addition to supervision
and another order he should undergo an alcohol treatment requirement. It took us half a second to decide that it was a nonsense to impose costs. So far so good but then we checked the law on
so called victim surcharge and noted that we were legally required to impose such
of £60. Now £60 to many readers will buy
a tankful of petrol or two theatre tickets or a ticket to Championship
football match or……….. So this poor
wretch has an amount which will wreck him to pay in 28 days. The current Lord Chancellor and his short
trousered advisors imposed this levy a couple of years ago so that “criminals”
can contribute to society for their activities in a simply understood
manner. Previously it had been reserved
as an addition to fines imposed. Those
sentenced to custody have more to pay.
If anything the M.O.J. has done since 2010 to persuade me that it is inhabited by aliens it is this iniquitous addition in the name of a
just policy. It is nothing but a feeble
disguising of a truth; that there are
those in the Tory Party who are still red in tooth and claw.
While accepting that it's extension in 2012 was under the Tory watch, let us not forget that the originator of this ridiculous tax was in fact good old NEW LABOUR. Let's give 'credit' where it's due eh?
ReplyDeleteAnd don't forget the nonsense in Youth Courts where you can end up with social services who have a youth in their care having to pay VS to another arm of government.
ReplyDeleteI refused to use the word Victim when imposing this tax and encouraged colleagues to do likewise.
ReplyDelete