I
practise no religion but am a regular reader of the Politico/Christian blog "Cranmer" in which yesterday he posted on the
Church of England`s attitudes to parties of the right and the
consequences for those ordained who are members of such parties. By
extension and sheer logic he conjoins those attitudes to clergy of a
UKIP persuasion. And what about Justices of the Peace? If a
colleague of unimpeachable reputation professionally and personally
were to reveal that s/he were a member of the BNP would that or
should that be grounds for bringing him/her to the attention of the
Lord Chancellor? And should the aforesaid politician take action
against such an individual? And following the logic of His Grace how
far should such such enquiry reach? Should it be extended to those
on the extreme Left whose views might also be said to be outside the
mainstream?
There
is news today that the Court of Appeal is considering for the first
time ever in modern times prosecution service`s application to take
to a closed trial people whose identities are to be kept secret as
also are the charges and evidence against them. For close to ten
years magistrates and judges have been and are increasingly
constrained by politically imposed sentencing practices known as
“Guidelines” I fear that the ancient English concept of justice
is being dissolved before are very eyes to such an extent that it
will be unrecognisable by 2050.
No comments:
Post a Comment