When
I was appointed one of the requirements on the application form was
to declare which political party had had the benefit of my vote at
the previous general election. I left the question blank and
unanswered. Not long afterwards I received a letter from the Lord
Chancellor`s Office informing me that unless I answered the question
my application would be discontinued. I complied with his lordship`s
“advice”. On the explanatory material at that time was also a
statement that common sense was a requirement. I understand that
that requirement is no longer a necessity owing to the belief amongst
those who devise and supervise the appoinments system that “common”
is an adjective which might have different connotations among
different ethnic groups and what might be ”common” to one might
not be “common” to others. Be that as it might we are where we
are. The Ministry of Justice with many other government departments
is now set upon the release of as many “initiatives” as can be
tolerated prior to next May. Never mind the quality, feel the width
is a candid description of much of what emanates from the press
office at Petty France SW1. The latest such offering is published today. What strikes me is the fact that there is an apparent need to
alter the law to encompass the mooted changes. Why on earth has our
legislature allowed such gross nonsense to have become the current
legal status quo so that Grayling must define his credentials by
amending what should never have been promulgated?
Seen
in the light of this and much else besides including the reluctant apologies of
party leaders for ignoring the undercurrents which have flowed across
many of the population for some years is it any wonder that UKIP is
proclaiming itself the best thing since sliced bread. Perhaps we
should be thankful that it is N.Farage and his cronies who have
benefitted from the vote of the disaffected and not those akin to the
fascists in Hungary and Greece.
No comments:
Post a Comment