It seems we are again making headlines. This time magistrates` courts are accused by
the Howard League of remanding too many defendants in custody prior to
trial. This story made the news in
today`s Times behind its paywall. The
full report was much concerned with the cost estimated at £230 million when that
related to those people later acquitted at trial or sentenced to non custodial
sentences notwithstanding that the recently introduced Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act
contains provisions to address the unnecessary use of custodial remand.
Few of my colleagues would disagree with
me in my opinion that remand on bail or in custody is the most onerous decision that we have to
make on the bench. There are only three
circumstances when an untried defendant can be remanded in custody there being
no conditions which could satisfy the risk(s) of being remanded on bail: a risk that further offences would be
committed, in the interests of justice which is mainly concerned that there
should be no interference with witnesses and lastly that the defendant would
fail to appear for trial. The increased prosecution of those suspected of
domestic abuse has possibly led to an increasing tendency to remand such people
in custody. Indeed the provisions of
LASPO have allowed for just such
situations.
The figures quoted in the report cannot
be understood unless the context of their inclusion is understood. But of course the Howard League which is a
single issue political lobby has no interest in serious debate if it gets in
the way of pushing forward its agenda.
There is no denying that conditions in British
prisons are and have for some years not been fit for purpose. Governments of
all hues have used prison numbers as much as a political tool as they have for
their prime purpose. The Howard League in emphasising the £230 million cost of
what it considers unnecessary remands in custody is playing the only game this
Justice Secretary wants to join; how to reduce costs. In that it has probably succeeded in its aim.
No comments:
Post a Comment