It seems that there are still some within
and many without the legal profession who still retain the concept that justice
is “local”. There is an argument to be
made that the concept should be and in many cases is considered an anachronism. When transport between villages and towns was
limited to the strength of a person`s legs for the majority and by horseback or
cart for most of the remainder of the population petty sessions had to be
held locally. As an example there were over
twenty petty sessions courts in the West Riding of Yorkshire alone in the 19th
and early 20th century. Currently
there are 871 J.P.s sitting in West Yorkshire and they now sit each for a minimum of 26 half days annually at
only four magistrates` courts in this
geographical region. There is currently
a consultation on the merger of the local
justice areas in North Yorkshire which portends more courts closing in that
area. Even in London with its transport links where many
courts have been closed and similar mergers have taken place attendees be they
defendants or witnesses can have over an hour`s travel to their “local” court
with the cost that that entails.
For M.P.s of whatever colour these closures are in reality a perfect
platform for them to broadcast their concerns for their constituents. I would opine that they know as well as those
directly involved that the HMCTS steamroller will not be persuaded from its
path by any argument that does not meet the single criterion of meeting its budgetary
requirements. But then there`s an election in a 100 days.
No comments:
Post a Comment