The suggestions put forward require changes in basic procedures, the collation of data and some little government expenditure. Last year I interviewed several of my former colleagues on this self same topic........MAGISTRATES` THOUGHTS ON UNREPRESENTED DEFENDANTS . The questions posed were by and large similar to those of the Transform Justice report. The answers from the magistrates were carefully considered and perhaps more appropriate conclusions were forthcoming insofar as the required additional cost was insignificant but the improvements for defendants tangible.
The provision of written material to be sent with the court summons would, they agreed, be of enormous assistance to those people contemplating self representation. All the aspects described in the report where knowledge might be lacking could be incorporated in the mailing. Such documentation could of course be made available on line for minimal cost. It seems that Transform Justice`s interviewees were unable to think outside the box.
The other innovation my interviewees considered with some favour was more controversial; namely an increased inquisitorial role for magistrates in order to level that ever diminishing equality of arms. There is no doubt that there is a tendency for government to see an increasing conviction rate as a proud boast of its successful law and order policies. For that to come at the price of losing our sense of what foreigners used to call "the British sense of fair play" would be a loss for us all.
No comments:
Post a Comment