Comments are usually moderated. However, I do not accept any legal responsibility for the content of any comment. If any comment seems submitted just to advertise a website it will not be published.

Friday 18 November 2016

ADDICTS NEED TREATMENT; NOT FINES

If ever there was an example of the futility of dealing with addicts in a court setting it was demonstrated by the well meaning but pious words of the chairman of the bench at Furness Magistrates` Court earlier this week.

2 comments:

  1. You ought to be a part of a contest for one of the finest websites on the internet. I most certainly will highly recommend this web site!
    Juvederm Injections Chicago

    ReplyDelete
  2. Crafty, but I suspect futire, bit of advertising there!
    More seriously, it does show how careful court chairmen and judges have to be before they open their mouths in court; less is generally better.
    That said, drunk and disorderly offenders are tedious, waste police and court time and block up police cells; courts are quite unable to do anything to alter their behaviour as only a small fine is available as a penalty. Most towns will have a number of very regular customers and nine times out of ten the fine will be deemed served by the time spent (usually overnight)in custody - for the main reason that the prospect of the fine being paid is minimal as they will already be having the maximum deduction from benefits.
    I think some prosecuting authorities have experimented with using old common law vagrancy acts to up the ante (can't remember offhand exactly which) but I suspect many courts will see that as equally impotent: probation can offer nothing which deals with the causes of their behaviour and imprisonment is seen as entirely disproportionate to the offense even in habitual offenders.
    So I agree with JP: addicts need something other than court. Unfortunately that will cost money so will not happen.

    ReplyDelete