This parsimony by the MOJ is a direct result of public policy. At every stage of the criminal justice system; from investigation, arrest, court, sentence, prison there is the distinct sound of the bottom of the financial barrel being scraped. At each stage from 2010 those working within the system made their opinions clear, except perhaps the judiciary to its eternal shame. Perhaps the nadir has been reached. Most people involved would hope so.
Comments are usually moderated. However, I do not accept any legal responsibility for the content of any comment. If any comment seems submitted just to advertise a website it will not be published.
Monday, 30 October 2017
SACKED JPs AND SCRAPING THE FINANCIAL BARREL
This parsimony by the MOJ is a direct result of public policy. At every stage of the criminal justice system; from investigation, arrest, court, sentence, prison there is the distinct sound of the bottom of the financial barrel being scraped. At each stage from 2010 those working within the system made their opinions clear, except perhaps the judiciary to its eternal shame. Perhaps the nadir has been reached. Most people involved would hope so.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
It sounds like we need to be weed out those who are not serious about the office at the point of application.
ReplyDeletePerhaps some sort of token (at least to begin with) contribution to HMCTS would show sufficient earnest of their desire to serve?
Then those magistrates who find themselves unable or unwilling to put in the minimum hours might be allowed to purchase indulgences, at a reasonable rate, or perhaps appoint a suitable deputy or deputies in their place?
Of course this extra commitment from magistrates should come with some quid pro quo. Perhaps we could ennoble them with a professional appellation carrying the cachet of the office.
... you know, I started typing that in jest, then by the time I'd reached the end of it, I was wondering if it was more a matter of when rather than if.
After all, in many parts of the world, justice operates on a pay-to-play system and local judiciary wield considerable power, and enjoy - consideration, shall we say - for returning the correct verdict.
Who are we to assert that our antiquated colonial system of an impartial volunteer lay judiciary is superior, or inviolable. Let's embrace the rich cultural diversity of the jirga, or the lucrative Colonial model of shovelling warm bodies by the busload into commercially run labour camps.
After all, why should clerks get all the rewards?