Now that I am retired having been many years a magistrate with a long awareness of the declining freedoms enjoyed by the ordinary citizen and a corresponding fear of the big brother state`s ever increasing encroachment on civil liberties I hope that my personal observations within these general parameters will be of interest to those with an open mind. Having been blogging with this title for many years against the rules of the Ministry of Justice my new found freedom should allow me to be less inhibited in these observations.
Comments are usually moderated. However, I do not accept any legal responsibility for the content of any comment. If any comment seems submitted just to advertise a website it will not be published.
Saturday, 10 May 2014
There are other insidious changes now so routine that younger colleagues find it strange that I question them when they arise in court. Yesterday we had inter alia a first listing of assault in a cafe. The complainant and defendant were strangers. Indeed the former was a visitor to the town and she lived over a hundred miles distant. When we were completing the case management form CPS told us she was considering safety measures (screens) for her and we allowed 28 days for her to make an application. My colleagues in later discussion questioned why I had indicated reluctance to the concept. Screens are available if the quality of the evidence of the witness is likely to be enhanced by the protection offered. Historically an accuser was expected to face the accused. Increased concern with domestic violence cases a decade ago ensured that virtually any application in such cases was nodded through. Now it seems that it is becoming increasingly the norm for screens to be applied for in the most common of assault cases such as above. IMHO this is a cause for disquiet. How many more of a defendant`s rights are to be surreptitiously withdrawn, withheld or to be rendered meaningless?