A question for
colleagues; does the attitude or apparel of a defendant have any influence on
the manner in which his/her evidence is considered? From time to time it is obvious that the person in front of us, statistically likely
to be male, has made an effort to be “presentable”; dark
suit and a white shirt with tie. So far
so good but what about at the other end of the sartorial scale? Someone brought in having been remanded
overnight in the cells might not be responsible for appearing looking like a
dog`s breakfast. My own words to a
defendant in the witness box with hands in pockets would be along the lines of,
“ With your hands in your pockets some might think you have no respect for this
court and that would not be a good way to continue.”
However when in
court answering to bail or a summons should somebody be criticised for showing
disrespect to the court because he presents with no regard to the occasion? It seems that at Hull Crown Court Judge Jeremy
Richardson QC thought that the defendant before the court was so poorly attired
that he needed to be punished for his lack of respect for the court and
promptly had him put in the cells for three hours.
A brief report
is available here.
No comments:
Post a Comment