As if there were
not enough writing on the wall to warn us that the days of magistrates in court are numbered Lord High Executioner Grayling
could not have made his intentions any clearer in his recent speech at the
National Bench Chairs Forum; an organisation which is a total waste of time and
effort. It is not representative of
J.P.s and is just a talking shop. It
effectively has divided magistrates
whose primary representative organisation, the Magistrates` Association, has
allowed itself to be out thought and out
manoeuvred by the weasels of Whitehall
whose long term plan is to have us removed from our position in the magistrates`
courts.
Magistrates in
buildings where there are no longer remand, breach or sentencing courts; those now
having dedicated venues, spend at least half an hour per three hour sitting on
down time if averaged out over a few months if my typical court is anything to
go by. And that means there is slack in
the system…..we all know why but that`s not for today.
“It’s utterly
absurd that three magistrates should spend their time rubber-stamping foregone
conclusions in simple road traffic cases.’ Thus spake Grayling. So in those traffic courts where it is not
uncommon for a bench to discover improper procedures or errors of one sort or
another two J.P.s will be superfluous whilst the third sits in an office. That`s enough to get rid of two thousand of
us. Next stop will be T.V. license
courts where 3,500 prosecutions are brought weekly. As sure as night follows day we will be told
that these also require only a single magistrate to rubber stamp the
decision. That`s reason enough to sack
or allow age related natural wastage to dispense with another three thousand magistrates. He was quoted also as stating that, “that
with a falling number of cases coming before the courts there needs to be
‘smart’ ways of deploying them”. It
cannot be more plain even for the chairman of the M.A. who refuses to believe
what is staring him in the face that the long term for J.P.s will involve mainly
non court activities. There might be the
solace of sitting as wingers to District Judges(MC) in trial courts for those
newly appointed J.P.s who would know no
better. Combined with natural wastage of
a relatively old cohort of current
magistrates mass resignations which would inevitably follow
would fit tidily with the change over to a fully professional judiciary in the
lower courts; a judiciary beholden to government and owing to its age and
background less financially independent of government decree that the current
senior judiciary. Of course that is exactly what government wishes to see
happen. The directions to DJs and sentencing results after the August riots
of 2011 are proof of that.
The weasels of Whitehall are on game and
set; only the match remains to be won.
How can this be "Open Justice?"
ReplyDeletewhy?? it's not like you guys are paid, although courts cost money to run I guess. this is very worrying
ReplyDeleteWorth bearing in mind that elsewhere in the UK, JP's manage fine on their own for minor matters such as most road traffic, breach of the peace, TV license stuff etc. Its not seen as rubber stamping - rather that the decision doesn't really need 3 people.
ReplyDeleteI'm not convinced that you lot really are on your way out... ...but perhaps if you resists change enough they might have a motivation.
Are Mags more expensive than DJ's. How can they be?
Are DJ's more controllable? But then the government will be directly to blame when the public don't like sentences etc.
The Guberment have realised that the game is up when it comes to statute law. Too many people (for their liking!) are challenging the system, particularly in regard to 'Jurisdiction'. Many have come to learn the fact that all Acts & Statutes are merely 'contractual'.
ReplyDelete