The topic of fines has been here
previously, previously and previously.............It doesn`t go away because
governments of all persuasions have no provision for a final deterrent against non
payers. Of course the usual claptrap
about means courts and ability to pay are used as an argument as to why up to
£2 billion in fines, costs, surcharges etc is unpaid. The numbers and arguments here in a single court in Northern
Ireland serve as a microcosm of the situation in Great Britain. It is virtually impossible to find official current
figures for the numbers jailed for non payment of fines etc. for offences
committed in England & Wales. Page
19 of this document is the nearest I can find.
The estimate is that about 100 fine defaulters are jailed annually. Perhaps that insignificant number is why that £2 billion is owed to the Treasury when one includes all manner of unpaid Fixed
Penalty Notices. When there is no active
deterrent to wilful non payers the system is a joke. Of course such opinions are anathema to those
in authority. Well known organisations
are on the phone to all and sundry when news of a Council Tax or TV License non
payer of a fine lawfully imposed refuses to pay and after perhaps a year of
hearings is sentenced to 7 days
inside. This is aggravated by the
pressure from the same organisations and others to remove the ability of
Magistrates` Courts to impose custodial sentences in any cases whatsoever. Nobody
from individual magistrates to prison governors wants these people put away but
what is an alternative? Whilst fines are
the most common sentence in our courts, mainly in the lower court system, without
enforcement they have no meaning. But as
with most matters in the justice system the public doesn`t care and politicians
don`t want to know.
Does that 100 seem reasonable to you? If that is the case I am responsible for 25% of all custodial sentences for non payment...
ReplyDeleteYou've misread p19 of the report. The POPULATION is roughly 100 at any time not 100 new admissions per annum. You could integrate under the curve - but I'd guess its more like 6000 per annum...
ReplyDeleteThanks for the correction; less haste more speed......
Delete